Jump to content

Bush is Da Man!


Peter_Puget

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 136
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Ooops, sorry trying finalize plans for a big climbing trip this weekend. Guess it gave you time to catch your breath Alpine. Nah, Trask is cool, even though I have seen him go off topic and ranting a few times (ok, a lot).

 

You have not figured it out yet....the Constitution doesn't give you the right to do anything other than what it says. If you congressman helped push a law through the House that ended up on the President's desk, was signed and then became a law that said you can't be in possesion of weed, then so be it. You had your state rights, right there when your congressman voted on this bill. If later your state has new law makers that disagree, then yeah they can pass a state law that says you can have weed, but that does not mean the feds are going to like it. You can't run and end around on a fourth and inches. So get your congressman to start a bill that will repeal the said law. I don't care if you got a 2 foot roach...have at it.

 

Ask yourself...if your state passes a law and it is challenged in federal court as unconstitutional and the court rules that it is unconstitutional....then is that judge a Nazi for handcuffing state's rights? Nope, now sit down. pitty.gif

Edited by n98947
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

This is a poem made up entirely of actual quotes from George W. Bush, arranged by Washington Post writer Richard Thompson:

 

 

MAKE THE PIE HIGHER

by George W. Bush

 

I think we all agree, the past is over.

This is still a dangerous world.

It's a world of madmen and uncertainty

and potential mental losses.

 

Rarely is the question asked,

Is our children learning?

Will the highways of the internet become more few?

How many hands have I shaked?

 

They misunderestimate me.

I am a pitbull on the pantleg of opportunity.

I know that the human being and the fish can coexist.

Families is where our nation finds hope,

where are wings take dream.

 

Put food on your family!

Knock down the tollbooth!

Vulcanize society!

Make the pie higher! Make the pie higher!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

N

 

Big climbing plans? in Chicago...hahaha whatever

 

If your for states rights then you would fight to repeal a federal law that conflicted with a state law, or at the very least you would look the other way. Asscroft has gone out of his way to mess with laws passed by the states.

 

I think the fact that you can't understand that is related to your notion that you could have big climbing plans while you live in the flatlands. wazzup.gif

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alpine K say:

"Bush is an idiot, a fascist. He's appointed an attorney general who is a member of the Nazi party and the KKK. Bush is not capable of doing anything good."

 

Uh...under ordinary circumstances, your first statement would be libelous. I also suggest that you ask Condaleeza Rice and Colin Powell (black), along with Ari Fleischer (Jewish) and a few other prominent folk if the KKK and Nazism are part of the program. I don't think so.

Furthermore, regarding the second comment, a smart guy like you should have a more open mind.

 

- your pal, Dwayner

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, I don't find it charming. I find it scary.

 

Bush is "not the sharpest knife in the drawer" as his mother said of him once, and I don't sleep well knowing that a genuinely stupid, and incapable man is at the helm of the ship.

 

Be afraid, be very afraid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AlpineK said:

Yes I did mean fascist.

 

Asscroft is a Nazi. All you republicans are suppose to be for State rights, however Asscroft has used his office to block OR's assisted suicide rule and CA's medical marijuana law. Both of those laws were initiatives passed by the state's residents.

 

The tax cut that just got passed is all for rich people.

 

There are two types of republicans, rich people and suckers.

 

 

In case you were'nt aware of it, Nazi is short for National Socailst. I sincerely doubt Ascroft can be called that, Consider this:

 

WE DEMAND THAT THE GOVERNMENT UNDERTAKE THE OBLIGATION ABOVE ALL OF PROVIDING CITIZENS WITH ADEQUATE OPPORTUNITIES FOR EMPLOYMENT AND EARNING A LIVING.

THE ACTIVITIES OF THE INDIVIDUAL MUST NOT BE ALLOWED TO CLASH WITH THE INTERESTS OF THE COMMUNITY, BUT MUST TAKE PLACE WITHIN ITS CONFINES AND BE FOR THE GOOD OF ALL ...

 

WE DEMAND THE NATIONALIZATION OF ALL BUSINESSES WHICH HAVE BEEN AMALGAMATED (INTO TRUSTS).

 

WE DEMAND THAT THE STATE SHALL SHARE IN THE PFOFITS OF LARGE INDUSTRIES.

 

WE DEMAND THAT PROVISION FOR THE AGED SHALL BE MADE ON A VERY GREATLY INCREASED SCALE.

 

WE DEMAND A LAND-REFORM SUITABLE TO OUR NATIONAL REQUIREMENTS, THE PASSING OF A LAW FOR THE CONFISCATION OF LAND FOR COMMUNAL PURPOSES; THE ABOLITION OF INTEREST ON MORTGAGES, AND PROHIBITION OF ALL SPECULATION IN LAND.

 

WE DEMAND AN AGRARIAN REFORM SUITABLE TO OUR NATIONAL REQUIREMENTS; THE ENACTMENT OF A LAW TO EXPROPRIATE WITHOUT COMPENSATION THE OWNERS OF ANY LAND THAT MAY BE NEEDED FOR NATIONAL PURPOSES; THE ABOLITION OF GROUND RENTS; AND THE PROHIBITION OF ALL SPECULATION IN LAND.

 

...THE STATE SHALL ORGANIZE THOROUGHLY THE WHOLE CULTURAL SYSTEM OF THE NATION . . . THE CONCEPTION OF THE STATE IDEA (THE SCIENCE OF CITIZENSHIP) SHALL BE TAUGHT IN THE SCHOOLS FROM THE VERY BEGINNING. WE DEMAND THAT SPECIALLY TALENTED CHILDREN OF POOR PARENTS, NO MATTER WHAT THEIR STATION OR OCCUPATION, SHALL BE EDUCATED AT THE COST OF THE STATE.

 

IT IS THE DUTY OF THE STATE TO HELP RAISE THE STANDARD OF THE NATION'S HEALTH BY PROVIDING MATERNITY WELFARE CENTRES, BY PROHIBITING JUVENILE LABOUR, BY INCREASING PHYSICAL FITNESS THROUGH THE INTRODUCTION OF COMPULSORY GAMES AND GYMNASTICS. . . .

 

(WE) COMBAT THE MATERIALISTIC SPIRIT WITHIN AND OUTSIDE US, AND ARE CONVINCED THAT A PERMANENT RECOVERY OF OUR PEOPLE CAN ONLY PROCEED WITHIN ON THE FOUNDATION OF "THE COMMON GOOD BEFORE THE INDIVIDUAL GOOD."

 

-- From the "Twenty-Five Point" Programme of the German National Socialist Workers Party, authored by Adolf Hitler and others on February 24, 1920. (Konrad Heiden's translation in A Hisotry of National Socialism)

 

Maybe it's just too late in the day, and I'm startingt to take things too literally. Don't get me wrong though, I thoroughly hate the jerk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another definition for ya'll:

 

Fascism - noun - A system of government that exercises a dictatorship of the extreme right, typically through the merging of state and business leadership, together with belligerent nationalism.

 

Extreme right... Union of State/Business leadership... belligerent nationalism...

 

Sounds like the Bush administration to me.

 

 

Check out www.bushorchimp.com

Here is a photo from GW's early political days, or "The Cocaine & Alcohol Years" as we liberals like to refer to them:

pic41.jpg

 

p.s. Yup, that's me on the right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The tax cut that just got passed is all for rich people."

 

Yeah, if you consider rich people those who actually pay taxes. This will save me a good grand or more, and I'm hardly rich.

 

"Dems have never made a big deal about states rights."

 

Of course they don't! If they did that, they'd have to recognize some limit to their megalomania and basic instinct to butt into everyone elses buisness.

 

 

Edited by MtnGoat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Fascism - noun - A system of government that exercises a dictatorship of the extreme right, typically through the merging of state and business leadership, together with belligerent nationalism. "

 

That's odd, considering the govts historically known as as Fascist, such as Germany's Nazi's and Mussolini's govt, as well as N Korea and others, are all socialist.

 

The definition provided by the poster provides the proof of fasicms being a form socialism, but the author of the definition was too inept to realize it. When you merge state with buisness ownership, you don't get a right wing govt, you get socialism by definition.

 

 

Edited by MtnGoat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

n98947 said:

Off to Hood this weekend dickhead. Feel free to come to Timberline and debate me some more.

 

Climbing Hood is considered big plans?? confused.gifconfused.gifyellaf.gifyellaf.gif

And why would I want to go to Hood at this time of year on a weekend (especially to debate with a mindless swamp monkey), that place is a zoo!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ursa_Eagle said:

 

 

Climbing Hood is considered big plans?? confused.gifconfused.gifyellaf.gifyellaf.gif

And why would I want to go to Hood at this time of year on a weekend (especially to debate with a mindless swamp monkey), that place is a zoo!

 

Well, since you are a mindless monkey you would feel that way. Just get in line and head up the way everyone else does. Not me, I will be surprised if we see more than a few people on our route. And yeah, Hood is big plans for a guy that comes from the midwest. Hell, the biggest thing I have out here to climb is your mom! yelrotflmao.gifyelrotflmao.gifyelrotflmao.gifmoon.gifmoon.gifmoon.gif

Edited by n98947
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Constitution doesn't give you the right to do anything other than what it says

 

No comment on the Bush v. Clinton/Gore thing...but let me correct the above statement.

 

It is often said that the consitution gives rights to Americans. This is said by many, right, left, democrat, republican, moderates, etc.

 

All of them are incorrect. One of the key tenants of our system is that the inalienable rights that we have were bestowed upon each person by "thier creator." The consititution simply recognizes that our rights that are god given (I'm an agnost, so don't get bogged down in what if your an agnost or an athiest, the point is by "thier crerator' not"the creator") and that the rights belong to us by birth. The Consitution, the Articles of Confederation, and the crown never gave us anything. They were put in place to protect rights, not give. When the crown tried to give and take it was dispensed with. When the Articles were unable to effectively rule, the states agreed to a Federal Republic with a Consitution to protect rights.

 

This may sound like a semantic game, but it has critical meaning. The old saying: What the lord gives, the lord takes away. If you read it logically: what the constitution gives, the constitution takes away.

 

The constitution doesn't take away, it does not give. It protects, it is the limits of power when power effects rights. Now it can be said that many "powers" were taken from the states and given to the federal government by the constitution. That is correct. There is a difference between a power and an individual right (though they obviously effect each other).

 

Sorry to ramble, but it is a key and important distniction often lost and or misundertood. bigdrink.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the "Oregon Cascades" Forum:

n98947 said:

Who's been up the southside lately? Any condition reports on the Hogsback or the WCR? I am preparing for a first time ascent of Hood next Saturday. I hope the warm temps don't screw it up.

 

Although you're probably right about seeing very few people on that route. If you're head is that far up your ass, you wouldn't see very many people anywhere... moon.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ursa_Eagle said:

n98947 said:

Off to Hood this weekend dickhead. Feel free to come to Timberline and debate me some more.

 

Climbing Hood is considered big plans?? confused.gifconfused.gifyellaf.gifyellaf.gif

And why would I want to go to Hood at this time of year on a weekend (especially to debate with a mindless swamp monkey), that place is a zoo!

 

Hood as big plans that's a hoot. You must be quite a climber being able to walk uphill on snow. yelrotflmao.gifwave.gif

 

The midwest is the sewage lagoon of North America.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just checking on conditions and possible routes. I don't care to do the hogsback what so ever. We are thinking of a hike up to illumination rock, then to crater rock, then to the summit via the old crater variation route. Now do tell! How many people do you expect I would see other than my climbing partner. And I am not talking about a half mile away. HCL.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...