Just some comments/ observations on the current parking and access issues in the park. . . . During the past 9 years I have had the had the opportunity to spend hundreds of days working and playing in Mt. Rainier National Park. During this time I have grown increasingly concerned at the apparent "policy" that fewer visitors is a good thing.
A good example of this is the whole parking issue at Paradise. Parking has always been a problem during the summer months.(Cars idling for hours at the front gate, arguements over parking spots, seeing the "No Parking at Paradise" sign flashing at Longmire,doing laps in the upper lot looking for a space, etc.) While the answers are not easy to come by it would be comforting to know someone is working on this problem. In fact the opposite is true. When the new construction is done we, the taxpayers, will have fewer total parking spaces.
When I consider this issue along with the reduced access in the park. . . Westside Rd. "Closed Permanently" Carbon River Rd. "Closed Permanently?" Sunshine Point "Gone with no replacement planned". I really begin to wonder if park officials really want us visiting, camping, and driving in the park?
Last winter during the epic flood situation the announcement was made that the park would be opening up to foot traffic on the weekends. The hope was that this would bring some visitors to the local shops and retailers. It was also said that hikers and snowshoers would be able to access some trails and the Westside Rd. Unfortunately, this lasted only one weekend. It was announced that the park wasn't prepared to handle the number of
people on the road. Did they have a plan? Didn't they expect the public to come?
The Pacific Northwest is growing rapidly and other government agencies do their best to accomodate the growth. Officials at the NPS don't seem to be making the same effort. They do, however,find the time and money to improve their facilities.
I truly feel that if this were a priority solutions could be found. Here are a couple:
What if the park bought a few acres of land outside the entrance, paved it and ran a shuttle service every 20 minutes? To encourage usage they could knock a couple bucks off of the entry fee. The Longmire shuttle, while a good effort, really doesn't go far enough.
While this next idea might be laughed off the table I feel it should be a least considered. Why can't parking be increased at Paradise? I realize the number one priority of park officials is to protect the resource, but they already have acres of parking in the park why couldn't they add more? When you consider the actual size of Mt. Rainier National Park and compare it to the addition of 50-100 parking spaces I really don't see why it couldn't be considered. What is worse for the environment? The thousands of idling cars over the course of a summer or 50-100 new parking spots?
As someone who continues to visit the park every couple of weeks I have to wrap this up by saying I am continually amazed at the dedication and commitment shown by NPS employees. My concern is with the erosion of the public's opportunities to visit one of the most amazing places in the world.