Jump to content

Seahawks

Members
  • Posts

    1863
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Seahawks

  1. and that right there is why, if god exists, he is a bit of a twit - why the fuck does saul get the personal jesus visit?!? waht's the point of keeping the rest of us heathens in the dark? for chrissakes, i'm a hedonistic fuck, and i know full well the powers of mental-illness to create illusions and fantasies, but if the Big Guy in the Bathrobe came down from the clouds w/ a plethora of big-bootie-bitches and waved his 16 inches around in my face while solving a rubix-cube in 1 second w/ his feet, i'm sure i'd be changing my tune damn quick too (probably even tvash too, though jaycee might need a big double-d rack to go w/ the long-schlong for full convincing). I hear ya. I probably change alot of the crap I do also. Its a very excellent question. Something I ponder alot too. In the bible there a story about a man I beleive in hell and he cries out to let God send him back so he can convince his brother not to end up where he is. God says to him I sent my own son and they didn't believe it. I believe God feel he given us enough. His next return will not come to die for mankind but as a conquerer and judge. Also by showing himself to you would that not be a kind of way to force you to obey him, of course it would and you just stated you would change. He wants you to love of free will not being forced in anyway. Enough evidence exist to make a choice. My thought. Jesus words before he died. Luke 16:31 NIV) "He said to him, 'If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.' Ever hear of the term doubting Thomas? Well thomas one of Jesus disiples who saw him die would not believe that he was risen. He told the others that he would not beleive unless he put his hands on Jesus. Thomas words on seeing the resurrected Christ. (John 20:27-29 NIV) Then he said to Thomas, "Put your finger here; see my hands. Reach out your hand and put it into my side. Stop doubting and believe." Thomas said to him, "My Lord and my God!" Then Jesus told him, "Because you have seen me, you have believed; blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed."
  2. so i heard that the peeps who witnessed jesus rise from the dead just made that shit up. Should I stop believing in Jesus just because of that? Maybe you can convince Saul who changed his name to Paul who was killing christian becuase he beleived the same thing, that this shit was made up. Funny thing is Jesus appeared to him. He stop killing christian wrote multiple books in the bible and hung upside down. Now maybe you tell him who killing christian that became one of the ones killed that the shit was made up. He was pretty convinced it wasn't made up. But hey you believe what you want. You have free will.
  3. The skeleton is incomplete, with critical parts missing. It is also highly fragmented. To establish hind leg function it is necessary to have the pelvic girdle to demonstrate that the leg bones (femur and small proximal piece of tibia) belong to the rest of the skeleton and to determine muscle attachments. The pelvic girdle is missing! With the forelimbs, the humerus and scapula are missing which are again crucial to interpreting function, as well as establishing connectedness to the skeleton. Furthermore, this one caudal vertebra was not even found with the rest of the skeleton, being ‘referred material’, found 5 metres above. In other words, the whole of the lumbar, pelvic and caudal parts of Ambulocetus were ‘constructed’ from just one lumbar vertebra, one femur, a small piece of tibia (no fibula, no pelvis), a small piece of the ball of the ankle joint and a few foot and toe bones. And yet a detailed description is given of how the animal moved in water and on land! Guess what dumbass it isn't even Ambulocetus that we are discussing. You cut and pasted some Bible-thumper's argument about an entirely different fossil. Nice argument, sorry it's irrelevant though! And I'm going to beleive some made up shit from and evolutionist? This is just like the Nebraska man. You do the same shit. Hey but if an evolutionist says it, its got to be true. How blind and how stupid even with your argument. And you dumb fuck it the same thing. Last time I checked it was about the walking whale. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambulocetus and this incomplete thing from a quick look is in dispute on both sides. "The Ambulocetus fossil was found in ‘lower to middle Eocene’ beds. Fossils of whales of the suborder Archeoceti have been found in lower Eocene strata,4 so Ambulocetus is unlikely to be an ancestor of modern whales, as claimed by Thewissen et al."
  4. I see you can't answer. You have no answer. So I expected this. You all do the same thing everytime. When it gets tough you bail. So get that petri dish out and let see if you can create life. Oh and never look anything up on the interenet or your an idiot. LOL
  5. Changing the argument. Always the case here. The question has not changed, Where are the tranitional fossils??? Maybe those fricking aliens came down and took them. Hell there should be millions of them everywhere.
  6. Answersingenesis.org? Is this what they tell you to turn to when the questions get tough? http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v8/i1/whale.asp Well didn't he look up Transitional fossil and came up with some whale that they don't even know what it is and tell me it the missing link??? Just like the Nebraska man. Evolutionist making up shit to crasp at straws. The transitional Fossil record is void and that is all he can come up with some incomplete fossil. LOL joke.
  7. LOL even evolutionist agree on this, your not very smart. They will not even argue this fact.
  8. no, actually they'd say that a new species coudl well emerge in just a few hundred years, which is virtually no time at all in the fossil record, and could therefore by easily missed again, you're missing the point, the existence of evolution has zero to do w/ the existence of god - darwin believed in god and contemplated a life in the ministry prior to becoming a naturalist - einstein was no atheist. if there is a creator-god, clearly the numerous laws of science (thermondynamics, gravity, light, evolution, etc) were part of that creation... The entire history of evolution from the evolution of life from non-life to the evolution of vertebrates from invertebrates to the evolution of man from the ape is strikingly devoid of intermediates: the links are all missing in the fossil record, just as they are in the present world of course I beleive created law and order to his creation. SH...despite the fact that we are on the same team, I'd caution you to appropriately cite the sources from which you are cutting and pasting. Four lines with no spelling errors is a smoking gun if I ever saw one. That was my point before, you think he getting any of his points himself. No way. Does he ever list his sources? Never. Then he will dismiss the discussion when he can't answer something becuase something not sourced. Well boo hoo. He gets the fricking idea. answer the question. Where are these transitional fossils? There are none. Big huge smoking gun.
  9. The skeleton is incomplete, with critical parts missing. It is also highly fragmented. To establish hind leg function it is necessary to have the pelvic girdle to demonstrate that the leg bones (femur and small proximal piece of tibia) belong to the rest of the skeleton and to determine muscle attachments. The pelvic girdle is missing! With the forelimbs, the humerus and scapula are missing which are again crucial to interpreting function, as well as establishing connectedness to the skeleton. Furthermore, this one caudal vertebra was not even found with the rest of the skeleton, being ‘referred material’, found 5 metres above. In other words, the whole of the lumbar, pelvic and caudal parts of Ambulocetus were ‘constructed’ from just one lumbar vertebra, one femur, a small piece of tibia (no fibula, no pelvis), a small piece of the ball of the ankle joint and a few foot and toe bones. And yet a detailed description is given of how the animal moved in water and on land!
  10. no, actually they'd say that a new species coudl well emerge in just a few hundred years, which is virtually no time at all in the fossil record, and could therefore by easily missed again, you're missing the point, the existence of evolution has zero to do w/ the existence of god - darwin believed in god and contemplated a life in the ministry prior to becoming a naturalist - einstein was no atheist. if there is a creator-god, clearly the numerous laws of science (thermondynamics, gravity, light, evolution, etc) were part of that creation... The entire history of evolution from the evolution of life from non-life to the evolution of vertebrates from invertebrates to the evolution of man from the ape is strikingly devoid of intermediates: the links are all missing in the fossil record, just as they are in the present world of course I beleive created law and order to his creation.
  11. Not it. another example of evolutionist crasping at the air. Ever hear of the Nebraska man?? The missing link was a pig tooth but hell they made up a great story and put it in text books all as facts too. LOL Some key words. "May", Also Other scientists were intrigued, but far from convinced, especially since the case for hippos has looked good, they said. and Kenneth Rose, a professor of functional anatomy and evolution at Johns Hopkins University, said Thewissen didn't provide enough evidence to merit his conclusions
  12. there's no such thign as "less or more evolved" b/c there is no beginning or ending point to life - living things aren't striving for anythign in particuliar, just being molded by the conditions that currently surrond them. darwin was not god. his thoughts on evolution (a word he didn't even use) are not like those of abraham. it is natural that one who believes in prophets would have a hard time accepting this...evolution can proceed at times at a rapid clip, as gould suggests, leaving few "transitional" forms, which you've still yet to define. Even those who believe in rapid evolution recognize that a considerable number of generations would be required for one distinct "kind" to evolve into another more complex kind. There ought, therefore, to be a considerable number of true transitional structures preserved in the fossils. Where are they?
  13. Given that evolution, according to Darwin, was in a continual state of motion . . . it followed logically that the fossil record should be rife with examples of transitional forms leading from the less to the more evolved. Do you understand? So where are these?
  14. Couldn't find any huh? Hey insults are second best when you can't find the answers. Smart.
  15. Are you talking Micro = adaptation or Macro-Evolution of one specious to another. I can agree with the micro but you screwed on the Macro. Create life from nothing or find the transitional fossils.
  16. If it there show it. I want to see the transitional fossil, it not there, there is none. Evolution doesn't work. Aliens works better.
  17. anyone can hold a fossile, nobody is denying that. They existed. Where is the transitional fossil??? They should be everywhere. They shouldn't be hard to find if evolution is true. Show me one.
  18. It not you guys. Its them. Get real. We are the have not and the are the haves.
  19. It must be God's will. still waiting for references to experiments where life was spontaneously created...thanks....here til ~ 6pm LOL you'll be waiting a long time it a farce. They can't create life and they don't have any transitional fossil record. Hell maybe alliens came here and planted life. Heard that one from an evolutionist.
  20. You can stand in front of a mirror and tell yourself whatever you want of it'll make yourself feel better, bud. After all, that's what you folks are trained to do. The U.S. Courts and public opinion don't quite gibe with your assessment, but then again, interpreting evidence (or presenting it) was never your strong suit. Funny thing is Public opinion is more on the side of creation. It the liberal judges that say we must beleive what they believe.
  21. Reasonable thinking. Except all the major players of our governments democratic system were christians. Hell they wanted to make Goerge Washington king. He turned it down.
  22. I'd say the tough shit is on your end, padre. The dumbshits you allow to represent you have been losing court cases by the bushel lately. Separation of church and state. Love it or leave it. If you don't like that in public schools, pony up the cash for private and STFU. let's make a deal...when you folks can spontaneously create life with a chemical reaction, you can teach evolution - in the mean time, if you can explain why evolution should be considered a foundational science for a highschool curriculum, I'm still waiting. So far I heard "you have to teach it because its science" - thanks Ivan - why I didn't think of that is beyond me They can't come up with anything. Only insults. The Nazis used that itimidation factor.
  23. education it self was a product of the reformation. Evolution is a church and such seperate it. Funny how the phrase "Seperation of church and state" is not in the consitution. While I agree with the seperation, I also say evolution is a religion and goes too. Its Humanism. If they want to keep it taught then I say its fair to involve other thought into the discussion. But no, they are to afraid of other thoughts.
  24. how would a person be an ignoramus if they didn't learn evolution. Let's talk about career fields for which the understanding of macroevolution is critical. Well, lets see. Not much really. Understanding natural selection/evolution is only central to a few sideshow disciplines, like... ....agriculture, all the biological sciences, pharmacology, pathology, anthropology, paleantology, ecology, genetic engineering.... ...other than that, not much would suffer. First, sounds like understandin genetic mutations would suffice rather than Macroevolution....second, those sound like college majors to me....not highschool subjects - what does the AVERAGE US highschool student take that would REQUIRE understanding evolution. I took molecular biology in Highschool - I don't remember needing a background in macroevolution Look, you're starting the family, not me. If you want ignorant kids, by all means, find the right private school. I'm sure there's one out there for you and yours. LOL why is it private schools grade out higher than public. More ignorant kids in public schools than private.
×
×
  • Create New...