The only reason the BRSP is involved is because you got them involved, if you would just never tell them about this sort of thing, there would be no problem and we (the locals who climb there regularly) would fix the problem. Joe, you told me you and the park rangers wanted to get "all of the webbing off of all of the trees" and now you want to put webbing on a tree. I agree with IAIN, the tree has withstood us (climbers) for a long time and I think it will withstand us for a long time to come. I mean its not like the tree moves everytime you lean on it. Its a pretty sturdy tree.
And bringing in outside evirmental groups, whether it is good for the tree or not is BAD FOR BEACON ROCK. Your going to get the rock closed. Bringing unwanted attention to our hidden jewel is not what we (the locals) want. If you involve the state, if they see a problem, there best interest is to close the rock.
My thought would be to not tell the BRSP or any other group anything you dont have to. I mean think about it, if you make a problem out of it, all it can do is bring bad press to beacon and the climbers.
Lets be honest I very much thank you for your service and hard work out there, I know your heart and thoughts are in the right place, but talking about this place online all the time and telling people that its safer to climb there because this ledge is clean and that ledge is clean and this anchor is better will only draw unwanted attention to what once was a secret (beacon).
With the tree subject, I think we ( the climbers )can figure the solution out without the help of outside (people who do climb or have never been to the ledge in reference) help.
Joe, the reality is I have been climbing at Beacon for about 10 years now, every year without taking a break. Jim O taught me to climb and is one of my best friends. I have never seen so much drama until you started posting everything you do online about beacon. Please stop posting everytime you go there. Not everbody needs to know how to traverse grassy ledges.