That's the first time I ever heard an innernutz assclown label Cronkite as 'trivial'.
I don't think you did your already somewhat...um...tenuous credibility any favors there, laddie.
It's unfortunately not the first time I see an assclown who doesn't understand what he just read. One incidence is trivial evidence by opposition to the behavior in general.
You know what, fuckwad? I grew up watching coverage of the Vietnam war. I watched it pretty closely...my 2nd grade classmate's brother died there, and me pops was there for 2 years. The news didn't pull any punches in telling it like it was. Reporters risked and lost their lives telling it like it was. If your lilly-livered, I've-done-fuck-all-but-whine post modern ego requires denigration of that kind sacrifice, that's cool. And you also need to fuck off, you pusillanimous little fucking insect.
Clear enough, or would you like another 'anecdotal' opinion?
As has been par for you, after misunderstanding and/or obfuscating the point argued, the sole need to appear to win an argue requires ad hominem attack.