None of them were firing at us, or sitting on top of weapons stockpiles (conventional weapons), or doing anything wrong?
If he was unarmed, then I think that murder is not much different than the CARE worker's...
I don't equate the two. These civilians are not intentionally murdered. It is "collateral damage" - a horror of war, terrible, and tragic. The CARE worker was intentionally murdered in cold bold. It is personal. I equate the later to premeditated murder, and the former to something like "manslaughter". If it can be proven that we *intentionallY* target civilians with our bombs, well that is another matter...